Barack Obama’s current level of support among white voters in a head-to-head matchup against John McCain is no worse than John Kerry’s margin of support among whites against George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Ask Gallup:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/107110/Obamas-Support-Similar-Kerrys-2004.aspx

And these numbers are likely to expand after Hillary drops out and starts campaigning for Obama, boosting his numbers with women and white voters who have pulled for her recently.

What if you were running for office, would you be proud that the generally less educated favored you!?

Hillary is only gaining ground with a well crafty campaign machine which draws heavily on demographic research. She said she ‘doesn’t trust economists’ in regions where the majority makes under 40k a year and never too a class in economics. She exploits the connection between Barack Obama and his “angry black preacher” in regions where latent racism still exists. She uses the “fear” pitch in regions where people still think Osama bin Laden is a threat to the U.S. Her message is what her polling tells her is the message to use.

She does not have more experience than Barack Obama. He has 4 more years of legislative experience, and his record in the Illinois Senate and the U.S Senate outshines her. I appeal to you to do research again, compare the two. here is just one article on Barack Obama, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010303303.html but there are many more.

The Clinton machine is formidable, and Hillary has proven she will do and say anything to get a vote. Which in the end means she is fueling the same divisive politics we had when her husband was in office. And no, the economy won’t get better, that was due to cheap oil, the internet, greenspan, and was pre-mass exodus of U.S. jobs (no thanks at all to Bill Clinton).

about: *”latent racism. Regarding the race issue: most polls show that Barack Obama edges out Hillary Clinton amongst middle-class (and upper-class) whites, while Clinton trounces Obama with lower-class whites. Which essentially says that the typically less educated, less sophisticated lower-class whites are duped by the Clinton’s “say anything to get elected” propaganda.”*

This text is from so called USA made man “educated” screaming and jumping when an orator blow his nose… or need a brake to eat his breakfast…
Bob, I am sure you did not get your PHD at Oxford and you are a “latent racism”.

i’ll give you this – george w. bush is the most effective cautionary tale about putting an unqualified, untested person into the white house. but i’d ask this: what has hillary DONE? really? what has SHE done on her own, outside of her husband’s career? if you have trouble answering that question, then i’d think twice about giving her the vote based on “experience”. i’m sorry, but I just can’t bring myself to believe that this country can only come up with two families to occupy the white house over the course of 24 years. at best it’s nepotism. at worst, it’s a derangement of our democracy.

nevertheless, if obama wants to “make his rhetoric real,” he’s going to need a legitimate roadmap for how he’s going to “change washington”. talking about it isn’t going to do a thing, and lofty promises aren’t going to deliver ohio and florida in november. he’s obviously a cerebral guy, so after locking up the nomination he should take some time off, grab a pen and a pad of paper, and get creative about how to deliver the goods he’s promising.